AntiSpamLogic

24 / Lawsuit Archive

Search past TCPA cases.

Look up real TCPA litigation by company, plaintiff, judge, or case name — outcomes, amounts, and cited sources.

50 records

Manuel Q. Juarez v. Bugaboo North America Inc.

pending
Bugaboo North America Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
2:2026cv04535
Community-sourcedSource

Natalie Erickson v. Voss Events Inc.

pending
Voss Events Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
2:2026cv04531
Community-sourcedSource

Monica Merrill v. The University of Phoenix Inc.

pending
The University of Phoenix Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
2:2026cv04502
Community-sourcedSource

Brian J. Lyngas, D.D.S., P.L.L.C., v. IQVIA, INC.

dismissed
IQVIA, INC. U.S. District Court 2026 Unknown

The court affirmed the denial of class certification in this TCPA lawsuit, highlighting the difficulty of certifying classes in certain TCPA contexts.

Docket
2025 WL
Community-sourcedSource

Cameron v. Case-Mate, Inc.

pending
Case-Mate, Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit alleging violations of the TCPA regarding telephone equipment usage restrictions.

Docket
2:2026cv09178
Community-sourcedSource

Ellis v. RX Pros LLC et al

pending
RX Pros LLC C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit alleging violations of the TCPA regarding telephone equipment usage restrictions.

Docket
8:2026cv02292
Community-sourcedSource

Callier v. Commera LLC et al

pending
Commera LLC W.D. Tex. 2026 Unknown

Individual lawsuit filed alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
3:2026cv02175
Community-sourcedSource

Jack Perez v. Safeeds Transport, Inc.

pending
Safeeds Transport, Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

A pending TCPA lawsuit filed in April 2026 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
8:2026cv00958
Community-sourcedSource

HENK v. MATE LOGISTICS, INC.

pending
MATE LOGISTICS, INC. U.S. District Court 2026 Unknown

A pending TCPA lawsuit filed in August 2026 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
3:2026cv10652
Community-sourcedSource

Le v. NRG Transportation Inc.

pending
NRG Transportation Inc. C.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

A pending TCPA lawsuit filed in August 2026 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
2:2026cv09263
Community-sourcedSource

Cano v. LVNV Funding LLC et al

pending
LVNV Funding LLC and Resurgent Capital Services LP W.D. Tex. 2026 Unknown

A pending TCPA lawsuit filed in August 2026 regarding restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
2:2026cv05921
Community-sourcedSource

In the Matter of Robocall Mitigation Database Filers

enforcement
14 unnamed intermediate and voice service providers FCC Enforcement Bureau 2026 N/A

The FCC Enforcement Bureau removed 14 companies from the Robocall Mitigation Database, requiring all voice service providers to cease accepting calls from these entities.

Docket
TCD-ROBO
Community-sourcedSource

Tom v. Consider Solar, LLC

pending
Consider Solar, LLC E.D.N.Y. 2026 Unknown

A class action complaint alleging that the defendant violated the TCPA by placing illegal telemarketing robocalls to consumers.

Docket
1:24-cv-1100
Community-sourcedSource

Michael Justice v. Bumble B Holdings LLC

pending
Bumble B Holdings LLC U.S. District Court for the Central District of California 2026 Unknown

A pending lawsuit alleging violations of the TCPA regarding the use of telephone equipment for marketing or communication purposes.

Docket
8:2026cv00896
Community-sourcedSource

Wilson v. Galen Health Institutes, Inc.

pending
Galen Health Institutes, Inc. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee 2026 Unknown

A pending lawsuit alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 regarding the restrictions on the use of telephone equipment.

Docket
4:2026cv00065
Community-sourcedSource

Campbell et al. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

settlement
Sirius XM Radio Inc. U.S. District Court 2026 Unknown

A major class action settlement involving allegations of repeated telemarketing calls to individuals on the National Do Not Call Registry.

Docket
2:22-cv-2261
Community-sourcedSource

Bradford v. Sovereign Pest Control of TX, Inc.

judgment
Sovereign Pest Control of TX, Inc. 5th Cir. 2026 Unknown

The Fifth Circuit issued a significant ruling regarding the TCPA, setting aside a decades-old FCC rulemaking concerning written consent requirements for telemarketing.

Docket
24-20379
Community-sourcedSource

Anderson v. Monterey Fin.

judgment
Monterey Fin. Services E.D. Tex. 2026 N/A

The court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a case regarding debt collection calls placed to a cellphone.

Docket
6:25-cv-00102
Community-sourcedSource

Koeller v. TD Synnex Corp.

pending
TD Synnex Corp. N.D. Cal. 2026 N/A

A court denied a motion to dismiss, allowing claims regarding unwanted calls to a number on the National Do-Not-Call Registry to proceed.

Docket
26-1102
Community-sourcedSource

Sundstrom v. Ocean Reef Media

dismissed
Ocean Reef Media W.D. Wash. 2026 N/A

Claims against two insurance companies were dismissed for failing to provide factual evidence of a vicarious liability agency relationship.

Docket
26-5036
Community-sourcedSource

Ortega v. Powur, PBC

dismissed
Powur, PBC W.D. Tex. 2026 N/A

Claims were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege that the third-party telemarketers were acting as agents of the defendant.

Docket
5:25-cv-0864
Community-sourcedSource

Card v. R.J. Reynolds

dismissed
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco M.D.N.C. 2026 N/A

A district court dismissed a class action regarding text messages, citing the Seventh Circuit’s Steidinger precedent to hold that the TCPA does not cover SMS.

Docket
26-CV-00433
Community-sourcedSource

Steidinger v. Blackstone Med. Servs.

judgment
Blackstone Med. Servs. 7th Cir. 2026 N/A

The Seventh Circuit held that the TCPA’s private right of action for Do-Not-Call violations does not apply to text messages because they are not telephone calls as defined in 1991.

Docket
25-2398
Community-sourcedSource

FCC v. 14 Providers

enforcement
Various (Apps Comms, et al.) FCC Enforcement 2026 N/A

The FCC removed 14 voice service providers from the Robocall Mitigation Database for failing to comply with robocall rules, effectively barring them from the U.S. network.

Docket
N/A
Community-sourcedSource

United States v. Dish Network L.L.C.

judgment
Dish Network L.L.C. C.D. Ill. 2017 Unknown

Major precedent involving massive telemarketing violations of the TCPA and TSR, resulting in a landmark $280 million government civil penalty alongside a $61 million private class action judgment.

Amount
$341M
Docket
3:09-cv-03073
Community-sourcedSource

Phillips v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC

pending
Mead Johnson & Company, LLC S.D. Fla. 2026 Unknown

Civil action filed alleging violations of 47 U.S.C. § 227 relating to unlawful restrictions on the use of telephone equipment, automated dialing, and telemarketing outreach without valid consent.

Docket
0:2026cv60828
Community-sourcedSource

Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants

judgment
American Association of Political Consultants U.S. Supreme Court 2020 Supreme Court Bench

Landmark Supreme Court precedent striking down the government-backed-debt collection exception to the TCPA automated call ban as unconstitutional content-based discrimination under the First Amendment, while severing the exception to preserve general robocall protections.

Docket
140 S. Ct. 2335
Community-sourcedSource

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

judgment
McKesson Corp. U.S. Supreme Court 2025 Supreme Court Bench

Significant Supreme Court TCPA ruling shifting away from administrative agency deference following Loper Bright, requiring district courts to independently interpret TCPA statutory terms rather than deferring strictly to FCC rulings under the Hobbs Act.

Docket
606 U.S. 146
Community-sourcedSource

Samson, et al. v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.

settlement
United HealthCare Services, Inc. W.D. Wash. 2025 Unknown

Settlement of $2.5 million resolving ongoing class action litigation involving alleged violations of the TCPA for automated telephone outreach.

Amount
$2.5M
Docket
19-CV-175
Community-sourcedSource

Johnson, et al. v. United HealthCare Services Inc.

settlement
United HealthCare Services, Inc. M.D. Fla. 2025 Unknown

Granted final approval for a $3.49 million settlement to resolve class claims alleging that United HealthCare violated the TCPA by placing unauthorized automated calls to consumers concerning its Optum HouseCalls program.

Amount
$3.5M
Docket
23-CV-522
Community-sourcedSource

Truong, et al. v. Truist Bank

settlement
Truist Bank W.D.N.C. 2025 Unknown

Class action settlement preliminarily approved for $4.1 million resolving claims alleging Truist Bank placed automated robocalls to cellular numbers regarding unrelated accounts without consent under the TCPA.

Amount
$4.1M
Docket
23-CV-79
Community-sourcedSource

Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, LLC

dismissed
Blackstone Medical Services, LLC 7th Cir. 2026 Unknown

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedent-setting decision affirming dismissal of a putative class action, holding that text messages do not constitute 'telephone calls' under the TCPA private right of action in 47 U.S.C. § 227(c)(5).

Docket
Not specified
Community-sourcedSource

United States v. XCast Labs, Inc.

enforcement
XCast Labs, Inc. U.S. District Court / FTC Enforcement 2024 Unknown

Federal Trade Commission enforcement action against VoIP telecommunications carrier XCast Labs for facilitating, routing, and transmitting hundreds of millions of illegal robocalls and fraudulent spoofed calls across the United States in violation of the TSR and TCPA regulations.

Docket
FTC Enforcement Action
Community-sourcedSource

Shelton v. EMPWR Solar

dismissed
EMPWR Solar U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 2026 Unknown

The district court dismissed a putative TCPA class action alleging unsolicited marketing calls against EMPWR Solar after serial TCPA litigator James Shelton failed to establish sufficient evidentiary proof that his phone number was actively registered on the National Do Not Call Registry at the time of the calls.

Docket
2026 WL 2244025
Community-sourcedSource

Johnson v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.

settlement
United HealthCare Services, Inc. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2025 Unknown

Class action settlement resolving claims that United HealthCare Services placed unauthorized calls and robocalls to consumers regarding its Optum HouseCalls program in violation of TCPA restrictions.

Amount
$3.5M
Docket
8:23-cv-00522
Community-sourcedSource

Truong v. Truist Bank

settlement
Truist Bank U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina 2025 Unknown

Class action settlement resolving allegations that Truist Bank violated the TCPA by placing unauthorized automated and robocalls to cellular telephone numbers regarding unrelated or wrong accounts without the recipients' prior express consent.

Amount
$4.1M
Docket
3:23-cv-00079
Community-sourcedSource

Seals v. Concora Credit Inc.

settlement
Concora Credit Inc. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon 2025 Unknown

Putative class action alleging Concora Credit placed non-emergency prerecorded and artificial voice calls to cellular phones regarding credit card accounts without prior express consent, including repeated voicemails sent to reassigned numbers. The parties agreed to a $9.375 million settlement comprising an $8.375 million fund and $1 million in compliance expenditures, which received preliminary approval in August 2026.

Amount
$9.4M
Docket
3:25-cv-00728-AN
Community-sourcedSource

Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid

judgment
Facebook, Inc. U.S. Supreme Court 2021 Sonia Sotomayor

In a unanimous landmark decision, the Supreme Court narrowed the definition of an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (ATDS) under the TCPA, holding that a device must have the capacity to either store or produce a telephone number using a random or sequential number generator.

Docket
19-511
Community-sourcedSource

Kattato v. Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.

pending
Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. W.D. Va. 2026 Unknown

In this putative TCPA class action challenging recruiting text messages sent without consent, the court issued an order compelling the healthcare recruiter to turn over internal text message transmission data during discovery.

Docket
7:23-cv-00485
Community-sourcedSource

Schuder v. Sticker Mule LLC

pending
Sticker Mule LLC N.D. Cal. 2026 Unknown

Civil enforcement action filed under 47 U.S.C. § 227 alleging Sticker Mule transmitted unauthorized promotional text messages in violation of statutory TCPA telemarketing restrictions.

Docket
4:2026-cv-02428
Community-sourcedSource

Tom v. Consider Solar, LLC

pending
Consider Solar, LLC E.D.N.Y. 2026 Joan M. Azrack

Putative class action alleging Consider Solar repeatedly transmitted unwanted prerecorded telemarketing robocalls and violated National Do Not Call Registry protections under 47 U.S.C. § 227.

Docket
2:26-cv-01150
Community-sourcedSource

FCC Enforcement Action Against RGTN USA Inc.

enforcement
RGTN USA Inc. FCC Enforcement 2026 Enforcement Bureau

The FCC Enforcement Bureau issued a formal Notification of Suspected Illegal Traffic against gateway provider RGTN USA Inc. for transmitting illegal foreign-originating robocalls, spoofed caller IDs, and vishing schemes into the U.S. telephone network.

Docket
EB-TCD Notification
Community-sourcedSource

In re Gen Digital Inc. TCPA Litigation

settlement
Gen Digital Inc. U.S. District Court 2026 Unknown

Gen Digital agreed to a $9.95 million class action settlement to resolve claims that the company violated the TCPA by placing marketing calls using prerecorded and artificial voice messages to consumers without required consent.

Amount
$9.9M
Docket
Unknown
Community-sourcedSource

Johnson v. Comodo Group, Inc.

settlement
Comodo Group, Inc. D.N.J. 2026 Unknown

The court approved a $1.625 million class action settlement resolving allegations that Comodo Group violated the TCPA through unauthorized telemarketing contacts, resulting in an average recovery of approximately $596 per participating class member.

Amount
$1.6M
Docket
2026 WL 296417
Community-sourcedSource

Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, LLC

dismissed
Blackstone Medical Services, LLC 7th Cir. 2026 Unknown

In a major precedent-setting decision, the Seventh Circuit held that text messages do not constitute 'telephone calls' within the meaning of Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA, affirming the dismissal of a putative class action concerning unwanted marketing text messages.

Docket
182 F.4th 532
Community-sourcedSource

TCPA mortgage autodialer class action

settlement
Wells Fargo N.D. Cal. 2017

Reported TCPA litigation over autodialed mortgage-servicing and collection calls to mobile numbers.

Community-sourced

Draker v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.

settlement
Sirius XM N.D. Ill. 2015

Reported TCPA class settlement over autodialed telemarketing calls to mobile numbers.

Amount
$35M
Community-sourced

TCPA autodialer / text-message litigation

settlement
AT&T 2014

Reported TCPA settlement concerning autodialed and text-message telemarketing. Verify exact figures against the primary docket.

Amount
$45M
Community-sourced

In re: Dish Network, L.L.C. (FCC Enforcement)

enforcement
Dish Network FCC Enforcement 2017

FCC enforcement finding of tens of millions of do-not-call violations and spoofed telemarketing calls; among the largest reported TCPA enforcement actions.

Amount
$280M
Community-sourced

Daley v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.

settlement
Capital One N.D. Ill. 2015

Widely reported TCPA class settlement alleging autodialed and prerecorded telemarketing calls placed without prior express consent.

Amount
$75.5M
Community-sourced